Asking £600,000 sits 103% above the upper end of the range.
Yield on Cost at asking falls to 8.6% — Marginal band. The income produced at this price does not service debt and reward equity simultaneously.
Net Initial Yield at asking is 9.2% — Marginal for secondary Glasgow. Asking implies prime pricing not supported by the income profile.
Offer explorer
Lender lens · five ratios
65% LTV · 8% IO · 7% costs · NOI £55,067 · VP £405,000 (lender basis)
The complex comprises five units plus workshops across approximately 13,663 sqft in Parkhead, with Building A (Buildings 3-8, c. 10,197 sqft of workshop and modular space) covered by a 5-year vendor leaseback at £48,500 per annum. Buildings 1 and 2 (3,466 sqft of cellular and open-plan office, north end of the complex) sit vacant and form the lease-up component of the deal. Stabilised ERV is indicated at £77,961 pa. The vendor's covenant is short and represents the vendor's own trading business, which a lender will treat as non-conventional income — vacant-possession value is the appropriate basis for the loan calculation. Refurbishment of Buildings 1 and 2 to a lettable standard is budgeted at £173,300 (3,466 sqft × £50/sqft) and is netted from the price the operational-reposition lens can support. Ground rent of £8,200 per annum on the part of the site held under a 125-year ground lease erodes the net stabilised yield. The deal type is operational reposition: same highest-and-best-use, value released by stabilising the vacant offices on commercial licences or short leases, with the leaseback servicing debt during lease-up.
Facts, condition, comparables, valuation stack, and purchase-cost schedule for due-diligence reference.
| Address | 30 Nisbet Street, Parkhead, Glasgow G31 5ES |
|---|---|
| Asking | Offers Over £600,000 (exclusive of VAT) |
| NIA | 13,663 sqft (eight units across the complex) |
| Property type | Mixed commercial complex: offices and workshops |
| Year built | c. 1990 |
| Tenure | Mixed heritable + 125-year ground lease (£8,200 pa, expires 2120) |
| Parking | 26 spaces, secure gated yard |
| Vendor leaseback | Building A (Buildings 3-8, c. 10,197 sqft): 5-year leaseback at £48,500 pa to vendor's operating business |
| Vacant | Buildings 1 + 2 (3,466 sqft): cellular and open-plan office, ground + first floor |
| Stabilised ERV | £77,961 pa per brochure |
| EPC | Available on request (not stated in brochure) |
| RV | Separate assessments per unit (breakdown on request) |
| Agent | Marc Erunlu / Emma Louise Erunlu, Lapsley McManus Property Consultants |
| Listing | LoopNet |
| Unit | NIA (sqft) | Status | Rent pa | £/sqft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building A (Buildings 3-8 + workshops) | 10,197 | Vendor leaseback, 5 years | £48,500 | £4.76 |
| Buildings 1 + 2 | 3,466 | Vacant (lease-up component) | £29,461 (ERV) | £8.50 |
| Total | 13,663 | £77,961 | £5.71 |
Stabilised gross ERV £77,961 pa per brochure rent roll. Landlord costs: ground rent £8,200, insurance £3,000, management 10% (£7,796), repairs reserve 5% (£3,898). Stabilised NOI £55,067 pa.
Selected ARY: 11.00%
Location: Parkhead, Glasgow — secondary Glasgow peripheral commercial pitch. Yield Selection Guide indicates 10-12% for Glasgow peripheral secondary offices. Midpoint = 11.00%. The lot size adjustment (+175 bps for sub-£500k) is not applied at the £600k asking anchor; the range solve dips below £500k but methodology applies the lot adjustment to the deal anchor, not iteratively per range point.
Term yield = 10.25% (ARY less 75bps, hardcoded). Reversion yield = 11.00%.
| ARY | Stabilised value (NOI £55,067) | Δ |
|---|---|---|
| 10.50% | £524,448 | +4.8% |
| 11.00% | £500,609 | selected |
| 11.50% | £478,843 | -4.3% |
| Basis | Value | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Rack Rent (gross stabilised, no costs) | £710,000 | ERV £77,961 / 11% |
| MV1 (stabilised, post-cost) | £500,000 | NOI £55,067 / 11% |
| Term & Reversion | £430,000 | Term £48,500 × YP5y@10.25% + ERV deferred 5y − refurb capex |
| VP (MV3) — lender basis | £405,000 | ERV / ARY less 12mo void, 6mo rent-free, 10% reletting, refurb £173,300, holding £4,200 |
| 180-day restricted marketing | £450,000 | MV1 × 0.90 |
| 90-day restricted marketing | £400,000 | MV1 × 0.80 |
| Asking | £600,000 | Vendor target (Offers Over) |
Refurb-to-let capex of £173,300 (Buildings 1 + 2, 3,466 sqft × £50/sqft Standard commercial scope) is netted into the VP and T&R calculations. Lender basis is VP — the vendor leaseback covenant is non-conventional and would not be underwritten as a conventional FRI income stream.
Asking £600,000 across 13,663 sqft = £43.91/sqft. The Edozo benchmark for commercial in a decent secondary area sits under £100/sqft (likely good value on a £/sqft basis); the figure here is well within that benchmark. The £/sqft test alone is not the binding constraint — the income profile and refurb requirement are.
For context, the stabilised NIY at asking is 9.2%, against a 10-12% secondary Glasgow peripheral target. The asking price is consistent with a near-prime yield on stabilised income, which is not consistent with the location or the non-conventional covenant.
Schedule at range upper (£295,000):
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| LBTT (Scotland) | £3,250 |
| Legal fees | £4,500 |
| Disbursements | £650 |
| Broker fee (1%) | £2,950 |
| Lender arrangement (2% × 65% LTV) | £3,835 |
| Lender legal fees | £2,500 |
| Surveys / DD | £2,000 |
| Total | £19,685 (6.7% of price) |
The methodology uses 7% as the standardised purchaser costs multiplier in the range solve. The itemised schedule above is for reference.
Refurb-to-let capex: £173,300. Buildings 1 + 2 vacant (3,466 sqft × £50/sqft Standard commercial scope). Not listed, not basement, urban Glasgow — no cost escalators applied. Tenanted units (Buildings 3-8, vendor leaseback) assumed lettable as-is.
Value-add angles, holding-structure recommendation, and supporting analyses for the bid thesis.
Viability: Strong. Buildings 1 + 2 (3,466 sqft) are the lease-up. Refresh-to-let budget £173,300 (£50/sqft). Stabilised contribution £29,461 pa on top of the £48,500 leaseback. Risk: Parkhead office demand is thin; 12-month void is the methodology assumption and may be conservative for a fully refreshed product but cautious for an unmarketed-vacant pitch.
Max purchase contribution: Included in the headline range (£245k-295k).
Viability: Moderate. Per the multi-let reference, Parkhead is not in the rate table; Dennistoun (a comparable secondary Glasgow pitch) sits at £28-37/sqft licence (office + health). 3,466 sqft at the Office column £28/sqft × 90% stabilised × 70% effective gross less 15% running costs would lift the Buildings 1 + 2 contribution from £29,461 conventional ERV to approximately £62,000 stabilised NOI. The premium is real but requires owner-operator overhead and a longer ramp; the methodology range above uses conventional ERV as the conservative anchor.
Risk: Multi-let demand in Parkhead is unproven. The Dennistoun rate carries a town-quality discount in itself; Parkhead may sit a further 10-15% below.
Viability: Moderate. The vendor is staying as occupier on a 5-year leaseback. Vendor's appetite for deferred consideration secured against their ongoing rent obligation could improve the buyer's day-1 equity position. Worth exploring at heads of terms.
Risk: Vendor business covenant is the leaseback covenant — same credit risk on both sides of the structure.
Viability: Weak in the near term. The eight units are separately rated but share the central yard and gated access. Title split for individual sale would require servitudes and yard-management arrangements; the ground lease on c. 0.40 acre complicates separation. Not the lead strategy; relevant only on a multi-year exit horizon.
Recommendation: Company SPV. The asset is commercial multi-let with active lease-up and ongoing management. SPV gives clean ring-fencing of the leaseback covenant risk, allows refurb capex to be expensed and capital allowances claimed, and is the natural vehicle for a higher-rate taxpayer holding sub-£1m commercial.
SSAS is technically eligible (commercial use) but the leaseback structure — where the vendor's own trading business is the tenant — risks SSAS connected-party complications if the buyer has any commercial relationship with the vendor. The active management overhead on the lease-up phase also sits awkwardly within a pension wrapper.
Scotland